منابع مشابه
An Explorer upon Untrodden Ground: Peirce on Abduction
Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914), the founder of American pragmatism, spent a good deal of his intellectual energy and time trying to categorise kinds of reasoning, examine their properties and their mutual relations. During this intellectual adventure, he was constantly breaking new ground. One of his major achievements was that he clearly delineated a space for non-deductive, that is amplia...
متن کاملPeirce and Frege on Logic
Though Peirce and Frege played crucial roles in the development of modern logic, there has been so far little scholarly work comparing their positions on the nature of logic. I offer here a comparative study of their views on logic and I show that, although they developed their views independently from each other and with very different projects in mind, their positions are extremely similar (e...
متن کاملThe Eco-Cognitive Model of Abduction (EC-Model). Is Abduction Really Ignorance-Preserving?
From the logical point of view, abduction is a procedure in which something that lacks classical explanatory epistemic virtue can be accepted because it has virtue of another kind: the GW-Model contends that abduction presents an ignorancepreserving or (ignorance-mitigating) character. From this perspective abductive reasoning is a response to an ignoranceproblem. Is abduction really ignorance-...
متن کاملCertainty, probability and abduction: why we should look to C.S. Peirce rather than Gödel for a theory of clinical reasoning.
This paper argues that Gödel's proof does not provide the appropriate conceptual basis on which to counter the claims of evidence-based medicine. The nature of, and differences between, deductive, inductive and abductive inference are briefly surveyed. The work of the American logician C.S. Peirce is introduced as a possible framework for a theory of clinical reasoning which can ground the clai...
متن کاملCritical notice Logical machines: Peirce on psychologism
This essay discusses Peirce’s appeal to logical machines as an argument against psychologism. It also contends that some of Peirce’s anti-psychologistic remarks on logic contain interesting premonitions arising from his perception of the asymmetry of proof complexity in monadic and relational logical calculi that were only given full formulation and explication in the early twentieth century th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy
سال: 2018
ISSN: 2036-4091
DOI: 10.4000/ejpap.1122